Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Falling in an Elevator

What to do when you're stuck in an elevator that has had all systems failure including the mechanical breaks? Well according to this article: get on your back! That begs the question: wouldn't an elevator in free-fall be an extraordinarily difficult place to lie down? I mean your center of mass is presumably begining several feet above the floor of the elevator. Once it begins to drop it will (assuming no significant restrictions, and lets face it, it's an elevator plunging) descend exactly as rapidly as you when attempt to fall to the floor. In that brief moment when you remove your feet in an attempt to fall down to the elvator floor you will in fact simply remain with your center of mass equi-distant from the bottom of the elevator only now with your feet removed. Your only hope would be than in displacing the air beneath it the elevator would slow down, while you in an box with the cage pushing the air along with it would not. But the difference would have to be significant enough so as to allow you to drop the few feet down to the floor before the elevator reaches the bottom. Thus the difference in acceleration between you and the elevator must be in proportion to the distance between your center of mass and the elevator floor (with the appropriate geometric factors) greater than the acceleration of the elevator in proportion to the distance it has to fall.

Here''s an interesting look at the elevator problem.  From my perspective the back-up breaking systems tend to work very well and thus if you're actually in free-fall I'd just totally disregard the breaking from the cables and what not since it has to be a pretty decent catastrophe to keep the emergency breaks from kicking in.  If we do that, then all that's left is air resistance.

Basic equation:
d = v*t   + (a*t^2)/2

assuming initial velocity is negligible:
t = sqrt (2*d)/sqrt(a)

Now let's say you'll be falling at the full 9.8m/s/s but the elevator will be falling slower due to air resistance.  Let's say the acceleration difference is 'ar' so the elevator is falling at an acceleration of (9.8-ar)m/s/s.  Now let's discover what ar has to be so that you have hit bottom of the elevator by the time the elevator hits the bottom of the shaft, calling the height of your center of gravity 'cg' and the height your up in the elevator 'h'.

sqrt (2*h)/sqrt (9.8-ar) >= sqrt (2*(cg+h))/sqrt(9.8)

This turns into:

ar >= 9.8-(9.8*h)/(cg+h)


Let's say you're 15 meters up and you center of gravity is 0.75 meters high.  That would result in a necessary air resistance of 0.47m/s/s  Of course a major problem there is the assumed constant, de-acceleration from the air resistance which would not be the case.  Quick back of the envelope calculation shows that the speed half-way through the descent is about 9m/s.  If you trust the math and base assumption in the above link then the air resistance at a constant velocity of 9m/s is 0.8m/s/s.  So in this example you would be OK.  Note that the total time of drop here is about 1.8 seconds, and it would take the majority of that time for you to go from your standing position to ground: a rather odd sensation one imagines.  Of course if you hit the ground and the elevator hits its ground at the same time you've done just made it worse by removing the effect of the cushioning the slightly slower drop the air resistance gave you.  Hopefully being on your back compensates!

Some calculations to find the break even height of drop if your cg was one meter above the elevator floor:

h+1 = 9.8/2*t^2
v_avg = 9.8/2*t
ar = 1*1*10*v_avg^2/1000
ar = 9.8-9.8*h/(h+1)

That give you a break-even at about 13.1 meters.  I'd want time to spare and not hit at coincident times so I'd say 15 meters but the minimal effect of air resistance on end speed probably isn't that big a deal at this point.  As a reference, 13-15 meters translates into 43 to 49 feet, or at typical 12 foot stories, that's around four floors.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Safety in Following the Prophets - Notes for a talk

Bednar, Things to act and be acted upon (2nd Nephi 2:14).

How does one become a moral agent? What separates those who act from those who are acted upon? What do we need to become a moral agent?

Control over out choices
D+C 58:28 For the power is in them [men], wherein they are agents unto themselves...

Knowledge of the impact of our choices
Hel 14:30 ...ye are free; ye are permitted to act for yourselves; for behold, God hath given unto you a knowledge and he hath made you free.

A destination towards which we may aim
Heb 11:16 But now they desire a better country, that is, an heavenly: wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God...

D+C 13:6 ...there is no gift greater than the gift of salvation.

The purpose of Apostles, Eph 4

Elder Scott [Speaking of the doctrine of the Atonement]" They must be more than principles you memorize. They must be woven into the very fiber of your being as a powerful bulwark against the rising tide of abomination that infects our world.

Heb 8:10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people...

2nd Cor 3:3 Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart.

Our life's path is a reflection of our inner self

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Some nights ago I noticed a moment right before I went to bed.  I had turned off my computer and all the lights on the bottom floor.  I began walking to the stairs and at one particular step my foot had left the ground and my body reached apex: no acceleration provided from my landed foot, no change in force.  At 2:00am I was no longer aware of any sound: I'm sure it was there but it was either the wrong frequency or of too low an amplitude to register for me.

So I wonder, what connected one point in time with the next?  Forgetting the question of finite time, how far down do we go before we reach a point of time which exists independent of the surrounding moments?  If there is no stimuli coming in, no sound or light or feeling what is it that links the moments together?  How do we know when time has moved forward and we've arrived in the present?  How can we connect where we are now with where we've come from?  That can range anywhere from adolescent questions of time displacement to something slightly more profound.  How is a moment defined?  Was it good or bad?  Can that be determined without the context of the moments to follow it, or those which proceeded it?

If any of those times are removed from our lives, what is left?  We create a true disconnect between times and at some point our past and future selves ares no longer linked in a four dimensional creation.  Does that remove the moral association as well?  Or is this the type of thing you wonder about after smoking too much pot in your philosophy 101 class?